Notochordal tumors (chordoma). Differential diagnosis. Immunohistochemical markers
- Authors: Boulytcheva I.V.1, Bertoni F.2, Bacchini P.2, Musaev E.R.1
-
Affiliations:
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
- Casa di Cura Villa Erbosa University of Bologna
- Issue: Vol 7, No 2 (2015)
- Pages: 31-35
- Section: ORTHOPAEDIC PATHOMORPHOLOGY
- Published: 23.04.2015
- URL: https://sarbon.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/422
- ID: 422
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Chordomas, low-grade chondrosarcomas, metastatic carcinomas share many histological features, generating at times, considerable diagnostic difficulty and, not infrequently, requiring immunohistochemical analysis for appropriate classification. In an effort to clarify the diagnosis and differentiation with other cartilaginous tumors, samples from 58 patients with sacrum chordoma were examined by immunohistochemistry with a panel of antibodies. The panel included antibodies to cytokeratin (CK), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), D2-40, GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein), NSE (neuron-specific enolase), chromogranin, TTF-1 (thyroid transcription factor), PSA, CDX-2, mammaglobin. The conventional chordoma stained for CK (16/16) EMA (13/16), NSE (12/16) and was negative for chromogranin, GFAP. Specific markers were helpful in differential with metastatic carcinomas. Chordomas are difficult to excise because of their location and intimate relation to critical structures. Two cases of dedifferentiated chordoma were described.
Keywords
About the authors
I. V. Boulytcheva
N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
Author for correspondence.
Email: irena@boulytcheva.com
Moscow
Russian FederationFranco Bertoni
Casa di Cura Villa Erbosa University of Bologna
MD
ItalyPatrizia Bacchini
Casa di Cura Villa Erbosa University of BolognaItaly
E. R. Musaev
N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
Moscow
Russian FederationReferences
Supplementary files


