<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skin</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skin</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Саркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2219-4614</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2782-3687</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">130</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>BONE SARCOMAS</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>САРКОМЫ КОСТЕЙ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Prevention of dislocations after endoprosthetics implatation in patients with bone tumors</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Профилактика вывихов при эндопротезировании больных опухолями костей</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sokolovskiy</surname><given-names>V. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Соколовский</surname><given-names>В. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>impaktor@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Orekhov</surname><given-names>M. N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Орехов</surname><given-names>М. Н.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Nisichenko</surname><given-names>D. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Нисиченко</surname><given-names>Д. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Babalaev</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бабалаев</surname><given-names>А. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Aliev</surname><given-names>M. D.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Алиев</surname><given-names>М. Д.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center Russian Academy of Medical Sciences</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Российский онкологический научный центр им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2009-01-11" publication-format="electronic"><day>11</day><month>01</month><year>2009</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>18</fpage><lpage>22</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-01-11"><day>11</day><month>01</month><year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2009, Sokolovskiy V.A., Orekhov M.N., Nisichenko D.V., Babalaev A.A., Aliev M.D.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2009, Соколовский В.А., Орехов М.Н., Нисиченко Д.В., Бабалаев А.А., Алиев М.Д.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Sokolovskiy V.A., Orekhov M.N., Nisichenko D.V., Babalaev A.A., Aliev M.D.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Соколовский В.А., Орехов М.Н., Нисиченко Д.В., Бабалаев А.А., Алиев М.Д.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://sarbon.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/130">https://sarbon.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/130</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Currently, replacement of major joints and bones with endoprosthesis in patients with bone tumors is the golden standard in the treatment of this category of patients. The most frequent complications are instability of prosthesis (fractures, aseptic loosening), infection of the bed of the implant, dislocation of the implants. In the department of general oncology 625 joint replacement 518 patients were performed. Dislocations frequency after prosthetics of a humeral joint was observed in 4,1% (3/73), 7,6% (6/79) - after prosthetics of proximal part of femurs, 18% (7/39) after total replacement with endoprosthesis of the femur. Thus, among all the cases 30,6% (191/625) were endoprosthesis replacement of proximal femoral and humeral bones and total replacement of a femur with endoprosthesis. Currently the intraoperative reconstruction of the capsular apparatus of large joints using synthetic materials is considerable.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В настоящее время эндопротезирование крупных костей и суставов у больных опухолями костей является золотым стандартом в лечении этой категории больных. Наиболее частыми осложнениями являются нестабильность эндопротеза (разрушение конструкции, асептическое расшатывание), инфицирование ложа эндопротеза, вывих эндопротезов. В клинике общей онкологии выполнено 625 эндопротезирований 518 больным. Частота вывихов при протезировании плечевого сустава составила 4,1% (3/73), 7,6% (6/79) - при протезировании проксимального отдела бедренных костей, 18% (7/39) - при тотальном замещении эндопротезом бедренной кости. Таким образом, среди всех случаев протезирований 30,6% (191/625) случаев приходятся на долю эндопротезирований проксимальных суставных концов бедренной и плечевой костей, тотального замещения бедренной кости эндопротезом. В настоящее время с онкологической и ортопедической точки зрения оправданным является интраоперационное восстановление капсульного аппарата крупных суставов с использованием синтетических материалов.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Trevira</kwd><kwd>arthroplasty</kwd><kwd>bone tumors</kwd><kwd>Trevira</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>эндопротезирование</kwd><kwd>опухоли костей</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Bielack S., Kempf-Bielack B., Schwenzer D. et al. Neoadjuvant therapy for localized osteosarcoma of extremities: Results from the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study group COSS of 925 patients. Qin. Padiatr. 1999, v. 211, p. 260-270.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Lindner N.J., Ramm O., Hillmann A. et al. Limb salvage and outcome of osteosarcoma: The University of Muenster experience. Clin. Orthop. 1999, v. 358, p. 83-89.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Winkler K., Beron G., Schellong G. et al. Cooperative osteosarcoma study COSS-77: Results after 4 years. Qin. Padiatr. 1982, v. 194, p. 251-256.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Aho A.J., Ekfors T, Dean P.B. et al. Incorporation and clinical results of large allografts of the extremities and pelvis. Clin. Orthop. 1994, v. 307, p. 200-213.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Gebhardt M.C., Roth YF., Mankin H.J. Osteoarticular allografts for reconstruction in the proximal part of the humerus after excision of a musculoskeletal tumor. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1990, v. 72A, p. 334-345.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Mankin H.J., Doppelt S., Tomford W. Clinical experience with allograft implantation: The first ten years. Clin. Orthop. 1983, v. 174, p. 69-86.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Muschler G.F., Ihara K., Lane J.M. et al. A custom distal femoral prosthesis for reconstruction of large defects following wide excision for sarcoma: Results and prognostic factors, Orthopedics. 1995. v. 18, p. 527-538.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Kotz R., Ritschl P., Trachtenbrodt J. A modular femur-tibia reconstruction system. Orthopedics. 1986, v. 9, p. 1639-1652.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Ritschl P, Capanna R., Helwig U. et al. KMFTR (Kotz Modular Femur Tibia Reconstruction System) modular tumor endoprosthesis system for the lower extremity. Z Orthop. Ihre. Grenzgeb. 1992, v. 130, p. 290-293.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Shin D.S., Weber K.L., Chao E.Y. et al. Reoperation for failed prosthetic replacement used for limb salvage. Clin. Orthop. 1999, v. 358, p. 53-63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Грушина Т.И. Реабилитация в онкологии: физиотерапия. Руководство для врачей. М., 2006, с. 159.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Hillmann A., Rodl R., Winkelmann W. Prevention of tumor prosthesis dislocation by joint capsule reconstruction with arti?cial grafts. Eighth International Symposion on Limb Salvage. Florence, Italy 43, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Gosheger G., Hillmann А., Winkelmann W. et al. Soft Tissue Reconstruction of Megaprostheses Using a Trevira Tube. Clinical orthopedics and related research Number 393, p. 264-271.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Enneking W.F., Dunham W, Gebhardt M.C. et al. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin. Orthop. 1993, v. 286, p. 241-246.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Capanna R., Leonessa C., Bettelli G. Modular Kotz Prosthesis. The Rizzoli Experience. In Yamamuro T (ed). New Developments for Limb Salvage in Musculoskeletal Tumors. New York, Springer. 1989, p. 37-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Maurer K.P., Refior H.J. Alloplastic replacement of the proximal femur: Indications, results and experiences. Z. Orthop. Ihre. Grenzgeb. 1996, v. 134, p. 21-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Ritschl P., Kotz R. Prosthetic implants in bone metastases of the lower limb. Ann. Chir. Gynaecol. 1987, v. 76, p. 159-162.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Veth R.P., Nielsen H.K., Oldhoff J. et al. The treatment of primary tumors of the femur with chemotherapy (if indicated), resection and reconstruction with an endoprosthesis. J. Surg. Oncol. 1985, v. 30, p. 252-258.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Rock M.G. The Use of Bateman Bipolar Proximal Femoral Replacement in the Management of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Disease. In Yamamuro T (ed). New Developments for Limb Salvage in Musculoskeletal Tumors. Tokyo, Springer. 1989, p. 437-442.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Ham S.J., Schraffordt Koops H., Veth R.P. et al. Limb salvage surgery for primary bone sarcoma of the lower extremities: Long-term consequences of endoprosthetic reconstructions. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 1998, v. 5, p. 423-436.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Luetten C. Total Femur Replacement. In Steer W, Thriene W (eds). Forum Orthopadie. Munich, Essex Pharma. 1990, p. 52-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Белоусов А.Е. Рубцы и их коррекция. Очерки пластической хирургии, том 1. СПб., 2005, с. 9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Olsson E., Andersson D., Brostrom L.A. et al. Shoulder function after prosthetic replacement of proximal humerus. Ann. Chir. Gynaecol. 1990, v. 79, p. 157-160.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Kock H.J., Sturmer K.M. Biocompatibility and ingrowth of Trevira prostheses following replacement of the cruciate ligaments. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1992, v. 30, p. 13-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Seitz H., Marlovits S., Schwendenwein I. et al. Biocompatibility of polyethylene terephthalate (Trevira hochfest) augmentation device in repair of the anterior cruciate ligament. Biomaterials. 1998, v. 19, p. 189-196.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
