Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skinBone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skinСаркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи2219-46142782-3687Publishing House ABV Press57410.17650/2219-4614-2022-14-3-20-25BONE SARCOMASСАРКОМЫ КОСТЕЙFunctional results in the surgical treatment of a tumor lesion of the proximal humerus with endoprostheticsФункциональные результаты при хирургическом лечении опухолевого поражения проксимального отдела плечевой кости с эндопротезированиемhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5772-4067ElkhovD. O.ЕлховД. О.
Russian Federation

Daniil Olegovich Elkhov

3 2nd Botkinsky proezd, Moscow 125284 

Даниил Олегович Елхов

125284 Москва, 2-й Боткинский пр-д, 3

aeon95@yandex.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3501-036XErinD. A.ЕринД. А.
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinsky proezd, Moscow 125284

125284 Москва, 2-й Боткинский пр-д, 3

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2976-8895BukharovA. V.БухаровА. В.
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinsky proezd, Moscow 125284

125284 Москва, 2-й Боткинский пр-д, 3

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8506-7455FilonenkoE. V.ФилоненкоЕ. В.
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinsky proezd, Moscow 125284

125284 Москва, 2-й Боткинский пр-д, 3

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4385-9048DerzhavinV. A.ДержавинВ. А.
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinsky proezd, Moscow 125284

125284 Москва, 2-й Боткинский пр-д, 3

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7944-3108YadrinaA. V.ЯдринаА. В.
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinsky proezd, Moscow 125284

125284 Москва, 2-й Боткинский пр-д, 3

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7507-7884ShatalovA. M.ШаталовА. М.
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinsky proezd, Moscow 125284

125284 Москва, 2-й Боткинский пр-д, 3

P.A. Herzen Moscow Research Oncological Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Ministry of Health of RussiaМосковский научно-исследовательский онкологический институт им. П.А. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр радиологии» Минздрава России1310202214320251210202212102022Copyright ©; 2022, Elkhov D.O., Erin D.A., Bukharov A.V., Filonenko E.V., Derzhavin V.A., Yadrina A.V., Shatalov A.M.Copyright ©; 2022, Елхов Д.О., Ерин Д.А., Бухаров А.В., Филоненко Е.В., Державин В.А., Ядрина А.В., Шаталов А.М.2022Elkhov D.O., Erin D.A., Bukharov A.V., Filonenko E.V., Derzhavin V.A., Yadrina A.V., Shatalov A.M.Елхов Д.О., Ерин Д.А., Бухаров А.В., Филоненко Е.В., Державин В.А., Ядрина А.В., Шаталов А.М.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://sarbon.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/574

The article presents current trends in surgical treatment for oncological endoprosthesis of the shoulder joint. The main benefits and disadvantages of the 2 main techniques used in shoulder joint endoprosthesis are analyzed. Possibilities of their use in certain groups of patients are considered.Aim. To systemize and analyze the results of using anatomical and reverse endoprosthesis, consider possibilities of optimization of selection of treatment tactics.

В статье представлены актуальные тенденции хирургического лечения при онкологическом эндопротезировании плечевого сустава. Проанализированы основные достоинства и недостатки 2 доминирующих методик, применяемых при эндопротезировании плечевого сустава. Рассмотрены возможности их использования для определенной группы пациентов.Цель работы – систематизировать и проанализировать результаты применения анатомического и реверсивного эндопротезирования, рассмотреть возможность оптимизации методики выбора тактики хирургического лечения.

anatomical endoprosthesisreverse endoprosthesissurgical treatmentcancerous bone lesionsанатомическое эндопротезированиереверсивное эндопротезированиехирургическое лечениеопухолевое поражение костей1. Damron T.A. Oncology and basic science. Lippincot Williams & Wilkins, 2008. Pp. 3, 63.Damron T.A. Oncology and basic science. Lippincot Williams & Wilkins, 2008. Pp. 3, 63.2. Choi D., Bilsky M., Fehlings M. et al. Spine oncology-metastatic spine tumors. Neurosurgery 2017;80:S131–7. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyw084Choi D., Bilsky M., Fehlings M. et al. Spine oncology-metastatic spine tumors. Neurosurgery 2017;80:S131–7. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyw0843. Wittig J.C., Bickels J., Kellar-Graney K.L. et al. Osteosarcoma of the proximal humerus: long-term results with limb-sparing surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;397:156–76. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200204000-00021Wittig J.C., Bickels J., Kellar-Graney K.L. et al. Osteosarcoma of the proximal humerus: long-term results with limb-sparing surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;397:156–76. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200204000-000214. Bielack S.S., Kempf-Bielack B., Delling G. et al. Prognostic factors in high- grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. J Clin Oncol 2002;20(3):776–90. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.776Bielack S.S., Kempf-Bielack B., Delling G. et al. Prognostic factors in high- grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. J Clin Oncol 2002;20(3):776–90. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.7765. Piccioli A., Maccauro G., Rossi B. et al. Surgical treatment of pathologic fractures of humerus. Injury 2010;41(11):1112–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.015Piccioli A., Maccauro G., Rossi B. et al. Surgical treatment of pathologic fractures of humerus. Injury 2010;41(11):1112–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.0156. Dahlin D.C. Bone tumors: general aspects and data on 6221 cases. 3rd edn. Springfield, IL, USA: Charles C Thomas, 1978.Dahlin D.C. Bone tumors: general aspects and data on 6221 cases. 3rd edn. Springfield, IL, USA: Charles C Thomas, 1978.7. Malawer M.M., Sugarbaker P.H., Lampert M. et al. The Tikhoff–Linberg procedure: report of ten patients and presentation of a modified technique for tumors of the proximal humerus. Surgery 1985;97(5):518–28.Malawer M.M., Sugarbaker P.H., Lampert M. et al. The Tikhoff–Linberg procedure: report of ten patients and presentation of a modified technique for tumors of the proximal humerus. Surgery 1985;97(5):518–28.8. Sirveaux F. Reconstruction techniques after proximal humerus tumour resection. Orthop Res 2019;105(1):S153–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.024Sirveaux F. Reconstruction techniques after proximal humerus tumour resection. Orthop Res 2019;105(1):S153–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.0249. Gebhardt M.C., Roth Y.F., Mankin H.J. Osteoarticular allografts for reconstruction in the proximal part of the humerus after excision of a musculoskeletal tumor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72(3):334–45.Gebhardt M.C., Roth Y.F., Mankin H.J. Osteoarticular allografts for reconstruction in the proximal part of the humerus after excision of a musculoskeletal tumor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72(3):334–45.10. Gebhardt M.C., Flugstad D.I., Springfield D.S., Mankin H.J. The use of bone allografts for limb salvage in high-grade extremity osteosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;270:181–96.Gebhardt M.C., Flugstad D.I., Springfield D.S., Mankin H.J. The use of bone allografts for limb salvage in high-grade extremity osteosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;270:181–96.11. Winkelmann W.W. Clavicula pro humero – a new surgical method for malignant tumors of the proximal humerus. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzdeb 1992;130:197–201. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1040138Winkelmann W.W. Clavicula pro humero – a new surgical method for malignant tumors of the proximal humerus. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzdeb 1992;130:197–201. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-104013812. Бухаров А.В., Алиев М.Д., Державин В.А., Ядрина А.В. Стратегия персонализированного хирургического лечения онкологических больных с метастазами в костях. Онкология. Журнал им. П.А. Герцена 2020;9(3):61–5. Bukharov A.V., Aliyev M.D., Derzhavin V.A., Yadrina A.V. Strategy of personalized surgical treatment of cancer patients with bone metastases. Onkologiya. Zhurnal im. P.A. Gercena = Oncology. P.A. Herzen Journal 2020;9(3):61–5. (In Russ.).Бухаров А.В., Алиев М.Д., Державин В.А., Ядрина А.В. Стратегия персонализированного хирургического лечения онкологических больных с метастазами в костях. Онкология. Журнал им. П.А. Герцена 2020;9(3):61–5. Bukharov A.V., Aliyev M.D., Derzhavin V.A., Yadrina A.V. Strategy of personalized surgical treatment of cancer patients with bone metastases. Onkologiya. Zhurnal im. P.A. Gercena = Oncology. P.A. Herzen Journal 2020;9(3):61–5. (In Russ.).13. Карпенко В.Ю., Державин В.А., Бухаров А.В. Эндопротезирование плечевого сустава при опухолевом поражении проксимального отдела плечевой кости. Исследования и практика в медицине 2015;2(2):15–23. Karpenko V.Yu., Derzhavin V.A., Bukharov A.V. Endoprosthetics of the shoulder joint with tumor of the proximal humerus. Issledovaniya i praktika v medicine = Research and Practice in Medicine 2015;2(2):15–23. (In Russ.).Карпенко В.Ю., Державин В.А., Бухаров А.В. Эндопротезирование плечевого сустава при опухолевом поражении проксимального отдела плечевой кости. Исследования и практика в медицине 2015;2(2):15–23. Karpenko V.Yu., Derzhavin V.A., Bukharov A.V. Endoprosthetics of the shoulder joint with tumor of the proximal humerus. Issledovaniya i praktika v medicine = Research and Practice in Medicine 2015;2(2):15–23. (In Russ.).14. Gosheger G., Gebert C., Ahrens H. et al. Endoprosthetic reconstruction in 250 patients with sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;450:164–71. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000223978.36831.39Gosheger G., Gebert C., Ahrens H. et al. Endoprosthetic reconstruction in 250 patients with sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;450:164–71. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000223978.36831.3915. Mittermayer F., Krepler P., Dominkus M. et al. Long-term followup of uncemented tumor endoprostheses for the lower extremity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;388:167–77. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200107000-00024Mittermayer F., Krepler P., Dominkus M. et al. Long-term followup of uncemented tumor endoprostheses for the lower extremity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;388:167–77. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200107000-0002416. Aliev M.D., Teplyakov V., Sicheva L., Karpenko V. Modern orthopaedical treatment of metastatic lesion of long bones. 17th Annual Meeting of the EMSOS, Oslo, Norway, 9–11 June 2004.Aliev M.D., Teplyakov V., Sicheva L., Karpenko V. Modern orthopaedical treatment of metastatic lesion of long bones. 17th Annual Meeting of the EMSOS, Oslo, Norway, 9–11 June 2004.17. Iwanowska B., Brągoszewska H., Mądzik J. et al. Imaging of complications after limb prostheses implantation in children with bone tumors. Pol J Radiol 2017;82:227–32. DOI: 10.12659/PJR.900644Iwanowska B., Brągoszewska H., Mądzik J. et al. Imaging of complications after limb prostheses implantation in children with bone tumors. Pol J Radiol 2017;82:227–32. DOI: 10.12659/PJR.90064418. Asavamongkolkul A., Eckardt J.J., Eilber F.R. et al. Endoprosthetic reconstruction for malignant upper extremity tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;360:207–20. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199903000-00025Asavamongkolkul A., Eckardt J.J., Eilber F.R. et al. Endoprosthetic reconstruction for malignant upper extremity tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;360:207–20. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199903000-0002519. Muramatsu K., Fukano R., Ihara K. et al. Reconstruction of the proximal humerus by combined use of extracorporeally-irradiated osteochondral graft and free vascularized fibula following resection of Ewing sarcoma. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 2010;63(12):2177–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2010.03.008Muramatsu K., Fukano R., Ihara K. et al. Reconstruction of the proximal humerus by combined use of extracorporeally-irradiated osteochondral graft and free vascularized fibula following resection of Ewing sarcoma. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 2010;63(12):2177–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2010.03.00820. Tomasik P., Spindel J., Koczy B. et al. Clinical experience in the application of allogenic grafts from a bone tissue bank in the surgical treatment of tumor-like bone lesions. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2005;7(5):476–80.Tomasik P., Spindel J., Koczy B. et al. Clinical experience in the application of allogenic grafts from a bone tissue bank in the surgical treatment of tumor-like bone lesions. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2005;7(5):476–80.21. Yin Q., Jiang Y., Xiao L. [Replacement of invert-type artificial total scapula and shoulder joint prosthesis for malignant tumor]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2007;21(3):240–3. (In Chinese).Yin Q., Jiang Y., Xiao L. [Replacement of invert-type artificial total scapula and shoulder joint prosthesis for malignant tumor]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2007;21(3):240–3. (In Chinese).22. Singh J.A., Sperling J., Schleck C. et al. Periprosthetic fractures associated with primary total shoulder arthroplasty and primary humeral head replacement. J Bone Jt Surg 2012;94(19):1777–85. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01945Singh J.A., Sperling J., Schleck C. et al. Periprosthetic fractures associated with primary total shoulder arthroplasty and primary humeral head replacement. J Bone Jt Surg 2012;94(19):1777–85. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.0194523. Singh J.A., Sperling J.W., Cofield R.H. Ninety day mortality and its predictors after primary shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 4,019 patients from 1976–2008. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12(1):231. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-231Singh J.A., Sperling J.W., Cofield R.H. Ninety day mortality and its predictors after primary shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 4,019 patients from 1976–2008. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12(1):231. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-23124. Angst F., Pap G., Mannion A.F. et al. Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total shoulder arthroplasty: Usefulness and validity of subjective outcome measures. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51(5):819–28. DOI: 10.1002/art.20688Angst F., Pap G., Mannion A.F. et al. Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total shoulder arthroplasty: Usefulness and validity of subjective outcome measures. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51(5):819–28. DOI: 10.1002/art.2068825. Zuckerman J.D., Scott A.J., Gallagher M.A. Hemiarthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2000;9(3):169–72.Zuckerman J.D., Scott A.J., Gallagher M.A. Hemiarthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2000;9(3):169–72.26. Dubina A., Shiu B., Gilotra M. et al.. What is the optimal reconstruction option after the resection of proximal humeral tumors? A systematic review. Open Orthop J 2017;11(1):203–11. DOI: 10.2174/1874325001711010203Dubina A., Shiu B., Gilotra M. et al.. What is the optimal reconstruction option after the resection of proximal humeral tumors? A systematic review. Open Orthop J 2017;11(1):203–11. DOI: 10.2174/187432500171101020327. Arman F. Schultergelenktotalprothese versus Hemiprothese. Zentralbl Chir 2003;128(1):17–21. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-37366Arman F. Schultergelenktotalprothese versus Hemiprothese. Zentralbl Chir 2003;128(1):17–21. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-3736628. Walch G., Boileau P., No l E. Shoulder arthroplasty: Evolving techniques and indications. Jt Bone Spine 2010;77(6):501–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.09.004Walch G., Boileau P., No l E. Shoulder arthroplasty: Evolving techniques and indications. Jt Bone Spine 2010;77(6):501–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.09.00429. Lenarz C.J., Gobezie R. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Vis Exp 2011;53. DOI: 10.3791/2281Lenarz C.J., Gobezie R. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Vis Exp 2011;53. DOI: 10.3791/228130. Campo-Aguirre R., San Román-Rodríguez E., Canales-Ibarra A. et al. [Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: complications and prevention]. Acta Ortop Mex 2013;27(2):128–32. (In Spanish).Campo-Aguirre R., San Román-Rodríguez E., Canales-Ibarra A. et al. [Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: complications and prevention]. Acta Ortop Mex 2013;27(2):128–32. (In Spanish).31. Kassab M., Dumaine V., Babinet A. et al. [Twenty nine shoulder reconstructions after resection of the proximal humerus for neoplasm with mean 7-year follow-up]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2005;91(1):15–23. (In French). DOI: 10.1016/s0035-1040(05)84271-0Kassab M., Dumaine V., Babinet A. et al. [Twenty nine shoulder reconstructions after resection of the proximal humerus for neoplasm with mean 7-year follow-up]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2005;91(1):15–23. (In French). DOI: 10.1016/s0035-1040(05)84271-032. Gouin F., Creen V. Reconstruction following shoulder resection for bone tumor. Bull Cancer 2014;101(10):951–7. DOI: 10.1684/bdc.2014.2033Gouin F., Creen V. Reconstruction following shoulder resection for bone tumor. Bull Cancer 2014;101(10):951–7. DOI: 10.1684/bdc.2014.203333. Boileau P., Moineau G., Roussanne Y., O’Shea K. Bony increased offset-reversed shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA). JBJS Essen Surg Tech 2017;7(4):e37. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.17.00006Boileau P., Moineau G., Roussanne Y., O’Shea K. Bony increased offset-reversed shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA). JBJS Essen Surg Tech 2017;7(4):e37. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.17.0000634. Микайлов И.М., Григорьев П.В., Пташников Д.А., Майков С.В. Результаты эндопротезирования плечевого сустава у больных c новообразованиями проксимального отдела плечевой кости. Травматология и ортопедия России 2014;27–35. Mikhailov I.M., Grigoriev P.V., Ptashnikov D.A., Maikov S.V. Results of shoulder joint replacement in patients with neoplasms of the proximal humerus. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii = Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia 2014;27–35. (In Russ.).Микайлов И.М., Григорьев П.В., Пташников Д.А., Майков С.В. Результаты эндопротезирования плечевого сустава у больных c новообразованиями проксимального отдела плечевой кости. Травматология и ортопедия России 2014;27–35. Mikhailov I.M., Grigoriev P.V., Ptashnikov D.A., Maikov S.V. Results of shoulder joint replacement in patients with neoplasms of the proximal humerus. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii = Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia 2014;27–35. (In Russ.).35. Holton J., Yousri T., Arealis G., Levy O. The role of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in management of proximal humerus fractures with fracture sequelae: a systematic review of the literature. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2017; 9(1):6977. DOI: 10.4081/or.2017.6977Holton J., Yousri T., Arealis G., Levy O. The role of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in management of proximal humerus fractures with fracture sequelae: a systematic review of the literature. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2017; 9(1):6977. DOI: 10.4081/or.2017.697736. Cheung E., Willis M., Walker M. et al. Complications in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(7):439–49.Cheung E., Willis M., Walker M. et al. Complications in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(7):439–49.37. Wall B., Nove-Josserand L., O’Connor D.P. et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:1476–85. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00666Wall B., Nove-Josserand L., O’Connor D.P. et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:1476–85. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.0066638. Flurin P.-H., Marczuk Y., Janout M. et al. Comparison of outcomes using anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2013;71(2):101–7.Flurin P.-H., Marczuk Y., Janout M. et al. Comparison of outcomes using anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2013;71(2):101–7.39. Flurin P.-H., Roche C.P., Wright T.W. et al. A comparison and correlation of clinical outcome metrics in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2015;73(1):S118–23.Flurin P.-H., Roche C.P., Wright T.W. et al. A comparison and correlation of clinical outcome metrics in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2015;73(1):S118–23.40. Ferrel J.R., Trinh T.Q., Fischer R.A. Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Proximal Humeral Fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2015;29(1):60–8. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000224Ferrel J.R., Trinh T.Q., Fischer R.A. Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Proximal Humeral Fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2015;29(1):60–8. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.000000000000022441. Letter H.P., Limback J., Wasyliw C. et al. Synovial cutaneous fistula complicating a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Radiol Case Reports 2016:11(2):98–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2016.02.014Letter H.P., Limback J., Wasyliw C. et al. Synovial cutaneous fistula complicating a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Radiol Case Reports 2016:11(2):98–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2016.02.01442. Potter B.K., Adams S.C., Pitcher J.D. et al. Proximal humerus reconstructions for tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467(4):1035–41. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0531-xPotter B.K., Adams S.C., Pitcher J.D. et al. Proximal humerus reconstructions for tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467(4):1035–41. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0531-x43. Kiet T.K., Feeley B.T., Naimark M. et al. Outcomes after shoulder replacement: comparison between reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2015;24(2):179–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.039Kiet T.K., Feeley B.T., Naimark M. et al. Outcomes after shoulder replacement: comparison between reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2015;24(2):179–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.03944. Somerson J.S., Neradilek M.B., Hsu J.E. et al. Is there evidence that the outcomes of primary anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty are getting better? Int Orthop 2017;41(6):1235–44. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3443-0Somerson J.S., Neradilek M.B., Hsu J.E. et al. Is there evidence that the outcomes of primary anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty are getting better? Int Orthop 2017;41(6):1235–44. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3443-0