<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skin</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skin</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Саркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2219-4614</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2782-3687</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">86</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>EDITORIAL</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОТ РЕДАКЦИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Long-term results of proximal femoral tumor endoprosthesis replacement after primary and metastatic tumors resection</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Отдаленные результаты онкологического эндопротезирования области тазобедренного сустава при поражении первичными и метастатическими опухолями</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sokolovskii</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Соколовский</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>115478, Moscow, Kashirskoye sh., 24.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Соколовский Анатолий Владимирович - кандидат медицинских наук, научный сотрудник отделения опухолей опорно-двигательного аппарата.</p><p>115478, Москва, Каширское ш., д. 24.</p></bio><email>avs2006@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sokolovskii</surname><given-names>V. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Соколовский</surname><given-names>В. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>115478, Moscow, Kashirskoye sh., 24.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Соколовский Владимир Александрович - доктор медицинских наук, ведущий научный сотрудник отделения опухолей опорно-двигательного аппарата.</p><p>115478, Москва, Каширское ш., д. 24.</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Aliev</surname><given-names>M. D.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Алиев</surname><given-names>М. Д.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>1125284, Moscow, 2nd Botkinsky p. 3.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Алиев Мамед Джавадович - профессор, академик РАН.</p><p>125284, Москва, 2-й Боткинский пр., д. 3.</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">N.N. Blokhin national medical research center of oncology of the Ministry of Health of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">НМИЦ онкологии им. Н.Н. Блохина Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">P.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Center</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена — филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2019-09-24" publication-format="electronic"><day>24</day><month>09</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>5</fpage><lpage>15</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2021-04-24"><day>24</day><month>04</month><year>2021</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2021-04-24"><day>24</day><month>04</month><year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2019, Sokolovskii A.V., Sokolovskii V.A., Aliev M.D.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2019, Соколовский А.В., Соколовский В.А., Алиев М.Д.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Sokolovskii A.V., Sokolovskii V.A., Aliev M.D.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Соколовский А.В., Соколовский В.А., Алиев М.Д.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://sarbon.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/86">https://sarbon.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/86</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Endoprosthetics of the hip joint allows provide early activation of the patient, in the first days after the surgery, to begin functional and psychosocial rehabilitation in the hospital, achieve good cosmetic and functional results, and continue conservative treatment, on time.</p><p>The study included 172 patients with primary bone sarcomas, metastatic lesions, benign bone tumors, who from March 1996 to December 2018 performed 194 primary and revision operations. In the study group of patients, 47.1% were diagnosed with a primary malignant tumor, 37.8% had metastatic lesion. The mean follow-up period was 80.87 months. The leading complication at the time of the endoprosthetics was late aseptic instability (Type IIB — 37.5%).</p><p>Primary and revision endoprosthetics survival after 5 years was 91.9%, after 10 years was 81.3%, after 15 years was 76.5%, after 20 years was 68% of patients. The average functional result on the MSTS scale after 6 months after primary and revision endoprosthetics was 72.6%, after 12 months 84.2%. Aseptic instability is the leading complication in the postoperative period 6.2%.</p><p>The introduction of innovative technological solutions in the design, materials of the endoprosthesis, will become a means of ensuring a further progressive decrease in the frequency of complications and increase the life of the implant.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава позволяет обеспечить раннюю активизацию пациента в первые дни после операции, начать функциональную и психосоциальную реабилитацию еще в стационаре, добиться хорошего косметического и функционального результата, продолжить консервативное лечение в установленные сроки.</p><p>В исследование включены 172 пациента с первичными саркомами кости, метастатическим поражением, доброкачественными опухолями кости, которым с марта 1996 г. по декабрь 2018 г. выполнено 194 первичные и ревизионные операции. В исследуемой группе пациентов 47,1% имели диагноз первичной злокачественной опухоли, 37,8% — метастатическое поражение. Средний период наблюдения составил 80,87 мес. Ведущим осложнением на момент выполнения реэндопротезирования была поздняя асептическая нестабильность (Тип IIB — 37,5%).</p><p>Срок службы эндопротеза после первичного и ревизионного эндопротезирования через 5 лет — у 91,9%, через 10 лет — у 81,3%, через 15 лет — у 76,5%, через 20 лет — у 68% пациентов. Средний функциональный результат по шкале MSTS через 6 мес после первичного и ревизионного эндопротезирования — 72,6%, через 12 мес — 84,2%. Асептическая нестабильность является ведущим осложнением в послеоперационном периоде и составляет 6,2%. Внедрение инновационных технологических решений в дизайн, материалы эндопротеза станет средством обеспечения дальнейшего поступательного снижения частоты осложнений и увеличения срока эксплуатации имплантата.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>bone tumor</kwd><kwd>hip arthroplasty</kwd><kwd>revision endoprosthetics</kwd><kwd>endoprosthetics complications</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>опухоль кости</kwd><kwd>эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава</kwd><kwd>реэндопротезирование</kwd><kwd>осложнения эндопротезирования</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aliyev MD. Endoprotezirovaniye kak osnova onkoortopedii. Carkomy kostey, myagkikh tkaney i opukholi kozhi. 2010;(4):7-12 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Алиев МД. Эндопротезирование как основа онкоортопедии. Саркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи. 2010;(4):7-12.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Aksnes LH, Bauer HC, Jebsen NL, Folleras G, Allert C, Haugen GS et al. Limb-sparing surgery preserves more function than amputation: a Scandinavian sarcoma group study of 118 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(6):786-794.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Grimer RJ, Aydin BK, Wafa H, Carter SR, Jeys L, Abudu A, Parry M. Very long-term outcomes after endoprosthetic replacement for malignant tumours of bone. Bone Joint J/ 2016;98-B:857-864.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Misaghi A, Goldin A, Awad M, Kulidjian AA. Osteosarcoma: a comprehensive review. SICOT J. 2018;4:12. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2017028. Epub 2018 Apr 9. PMID: 29629690; PMCID: PMC5890448.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Thambapillary S, Rozalia Dimitriou, Kostantinos G. Makridis, Evangelos M. Fragkakis, Peter Bobak, Peter V. Giannoudis. Implant Longevity, Complications and Functional Outcome Following Proximal Femoral Arthroplasty for Musculoskeletal Tumors A Systematic Review. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013;(28):1381-1385.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Janssen, Stein &amp; W. G. Langerhuizen, David &amp; H. Schwab, Joseph &amp; Bramer, Jos. (2018). Outcome after reconstruction of proximal femoral tumors: A systematic review. Journal of Surgical Oncology. DOI: org/10.1002/jso.25297.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Houdek MT, Watts CD, Wyles CC, Rose PS, Taunton MJ, Sim FH. Functional and oncologic outcome of cemented endoprosthesis for malignant proximal femoral tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(4):501-506. DOI: 10.1002/jso.24339. Epub 2016 Jun 28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Sokolovski VA, Voloshin VP, Aliev MD, Zubikov VS, Saravanan SA, Martynenko DV, Nisichenko DV, Strelnikov KN. Total hip replacement for proximal femoral tumours: our midterm results. International Orthopaedics (SICOT). 2006;30:399-402.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Henderson ER, Keeney BJ, Pala E et al. The stability of the hip after the use of a proximal femoral endoprosthesis for oncological indications: analysis of variables relating to the patient and the surgical technique. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B:531-537.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Du Z, Tang S, Yang R, Tang X, Ji T, Guo W. Use of an artificial ligament decreases hip dislocation and improves limb function after total femoral prosthetic replacement following femoral tumor resection. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:1507-1514.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Jones KB, Griffin AM, Chandrasekar CR, Biau D, Babinet A, Deheshi B, Bell RS, Grimer RJ, Wunder JS, Ferguson PC. Patient-oriented functional results of total femoral endoprosthetic reconstruction following oncologic resection. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104:561-565. DOI: 10.1002/jso.22003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Sevelda F, Reinhard Schuh, Jochen Gerhard Hofstaetter, Martina Schinhan, Reinhard Windhager, Philipp Theodor Funovics. Total Femur Replacement After Tumor Resection: Limb Salvage. Usually Achieved But Complications and Failures are Common. 2015;473(6):2079-2087.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Gorter J, Ploegmakers JJW, Ten Have BLEF, Schreuder HWB, Jutte PC. The push-through total femoral prosthesis offers a functionalalternative to total femoral replacement: a case series. International Orthopaedics (SICOT). 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3467-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sokolovskij AV, Sokolovskij VA, Badyrov RN, Aliev MD. Pervyj opyt diafizsohranyayushchego total'nogo endoprotezirovaniya bedrennoj kosti. Klinicheskij sluchaj. Sarkomy kostej, myagkih tkanej i opuholi kozhi. 2017;(3):43-49 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Соколовский АВ, Соколовский ВА, Бадыров РН, Алиев МД. Первый опыт диафизсохраняющего тотального эндопротезирования бедренной кости. Клинический случай. Саркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи. 2017;(3):43-49.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Sewell MD, Spiegelberg BG, Hanna SA, Aston WJ, Bartlett W, Blunn GW, David LA, Cannon SR, Briggs TW. Total femoral endoprosthetic replacement following excision of bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg (Br.). 2009;91:1513-1520.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Thambapillary S, Rozalia Dimitriou, Kostantinos G Makridis, Evangelos M Fragkakis, Peter Bobak, Peter V Giannoudis. Implant Longevity, Complications and Functional Outcome Following Proximal Femoral Arthroplasty for Musculoskeletal Tumors A Systematic Review. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1381-1385.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Stein J Janssen, David WG Langerhuizen, Joseph H Schwab, Jos AM Bramer. Outcome after reconstruction of proximal femoral tumors: A systematic review. J Surg Oncol. 2019;119:120-129.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Jacofsky DJ, Hedley AK. Fundamentals of revision hip arthprolasty. Slack Incorporated. 2014:35-65.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(11):2456-2463.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Kelley SS, Lachiewicz PF, Hickman JM, Paterno SM. Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;(355):163-170.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Joseph L Finstein, Joseph J King, Edward J Fox, Christian M Ogilvie, Richard D Lackman. Bipolar Proximal Femoral Replacement Prostheses for Musculoskeletal Neoplasms. Clinical Orthopaedics And Related Research. 2007;(459):66-75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Pellegrini VD Jr, Heiges BA, Bixler B, Lehman EB, Davis CM 3rd. Minimum ten-year results of primary bipolar hiparthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1817-1825.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Menendez LR, Ahlmann ER, Kermani C, Gotha H. Endoprosthetic reconstruction for neoplasms of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;450:46-51.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Chandrasekar CR, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Abudu AT. Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008;3:50. DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-3-50. PubMed PMID: 18983677; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2614964.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
